respectable normative corporate trans lady

respectable normative corporate trans lady

fckyeahprettyboys:

Danila Kovalev

fckyeahprettyboys:

Danila Kovalev

asker

Anonymous asked: I don't know if I'm missing something where it's a term used when arguing about this stuff, but the "100% male rationalist idiocy" line stood out to me. Are they claiming that your position is rational, and also that only men can be rational, and therefore you're not a woman and also wrong about the thing you're being rational about?

I’ve encountered this before, from someone who was unable to provide any evidence that cis women were in actual danger due to trans women in restrooms. When I pointed out that their concerns appeared to be completely baseless and thus irrelevant to policy, they then proposed a process of “building consensus” - which they told me was “often found in groups run by women”, in which “people with concerns share them and solutions are found that everybody can live with”. In other words, it’s an arena of pure opinion where facts have no power to invalidate any “concern”.

Such notions of “building consensus” and “male rationalist idiocy” accomplish two things:

1. Reinforcing gender essentialism and sexism by claiming that men and women are inherently predisposed to, and more skilled at, different kinds of cognition and behavior - ‘men think like this, women think like that’.

2. Reinforcing misogyny by implying that women are averse to rationality, dismissive of reality, and interested solely in their own free-floating opinions.

None of this seems particularly radical, or feminist. It’s just repackaged patriarchy.

asker

Anonymous asked: "It is reasonable to assume that any transwoman may be a man with violent past[.]" But they're not transphobic at all, nope. Sounds like an objective rational judgement to me. For sure. Totally not transphobic.

It is reasonable to assume that any cis woman may be the next Aileen Wuornos, because assuming that everyone is a murderer is a completely sensible way to go about your life

asker

cattrebuchet asked: "but I don’t think violent people should be granted trans status" apparently "trans status" is now a thing that can be granted or taken if you don't behave yourself

It’s one of the most glaring category errors I’ve ever seen. If someone is trans, they don’t stop being trans the moment they commit murder. There’s no connection between those things.

genderoftheday:

Today’s Gender of the day is: A Cisco 3750X 48 Port PoE Switch

genderoftheday:

Today’s Gender of the day is: A Cisco 3750X 48 Port PoE Switch

snowflakeespecial:

plansfornigel:

Like Laverne Cox this idiot thinks that SRS is every man’s right regardless of past history of character. No. People with a proven history of violence should not be allowed to legally change gender or name.
I am so pro castration on demand, it hurts, but I don’t think violent people should be granted trans status. What’s at the heart of the so-called “bathroom debates” is this; convicted rapists and murderers are allowed to legally change gender. It is reasonable to assume that any transwoman may be a man with violent past cause he could be, child molesters are allowed to change gender.
How does this policy benefit ANYONE other than men with violent histories? Spoiler: IT DOESN”T. Trans politics needs a coup and a regime change, cause their shining golden girl Laverne Cox along with Sylvia Rivera Law Project is promoting policy that is no different from what this jackass in the screen cap is saying.

I’m a trans woman and I DO NOT SUPPORT legal change of sex designation for trans women who rape and murder girls and women. Not now, not ever. If you are a trans women who doesn’t hate women, you shouldn’t support this either.
Zinnia, shame on you. Though you obviously have no shame, hence the Godwining yourself. Oh, and if you wonder why some radical feminist think you’re a man, it’s because I’ve never in my life met a woman who would say this kind of bullshit. 100% male “rationalist” idiocy.

hey congrats on being so self-hating that you ended up in the new yorker for it :thumbsup:

snowflakeespecial:

plansfornigel:

Like Laverne Cox this idiot thinks that SRS is every man’s right regardless of past history of character. No. People with a proven history of violence should not be allowed to legally change gender or name.

I am so pro castration on demand, it hurts, but I don’t think violent people should be granted trans status. What’s at the heart of the so-called “bathroom debates” is this; convicted rapists and murderers are allowed to legally change gender. It is reasonable to assume that any transwoman may be a man with violent past cause he could be, child molesters are allowed to change gender.

How does this policy benefit ANYONE other than men with violent histories? Spoiler: IT DOESN”T. Trans politics needs a coup and a regime change, cause their shining golden girl Laverne Cox along with Sylvia Rivera Law Project is promoting policy that is no different from what this jackass in the screen cap is saying.

I’m a trans woman and I DO NOT SUPPORT legal change of sex designation for trans women who rape and murder girls and women. Not now, not ever. If you are a trans women who doesn’t hate women, you shouldn’t support this either.

Zinnia, shame on you. Though you obviously have no shame, hence the Godwining yourself. Oh, and if you wonder why some radical feminist think you’re a man, it’s because I’ve never in my life met a woman who would say this kind of bullshit. 100% male “rationalist” idiocy.

hey congrats on being so self-hating that you ended up in the new yorker for it :thumbsup:

asker

Anonymous asked: I hope you're aware seeing you in a video with Cinema Snob basically made my life awesome

I loved that video! It was super fun.

asker

Anonymous asked: What kind of drinks are you drinking? I am drinking some wine

Arbor Mist. Like wine but not.

asker

Anonymous asked: Do you have opinions on famous male youtube atheists? The ones that come to mind right away are thunderf00t and Amazing Atheist.

Those two are both devout assholes.